Queen Elizabeth II Will Go Fur Free (Sort of)
“The Other Side of the Coin: The Queen, the Dresser and the Wardrobe.”
Prada, Versace and Coach have opted to stop using real fur in their collections.
Buckingham Palace, in a statement issued to media outlets based in the United Kingdom, confirmed the report — but with a caveat. It pointed out that the queen won’t be ridding her wardrobe of ceremonial robes and other official garments that are lined with fur, and that she could still wear them on occasion.
Humane groups commended the queen for her fashion choice, saying it reflected the mood of the British public toward the use of real fur.
“Our Head of State going fur-free sends a powerful message that fur is firmly out of fashion and does not belong with Brand Britain,” Claire Bass, executive director of Humane Society Internationals U.K. division, said in a statement.
Ms. Bass said the queen’s decision was a boon for the anti-fur movement.
“The U.K. banned fur farming almost two decades ago because it was deemed too cruel, now we must finish the job and ban fur sales too,” Ms. Bass said. “We are calling on the British government to follow Her Majesty’s example and make the U.K. the first country in the world to ban the sale of animal fur.”
The queen, who assumed the throne in 1952 after her father died, has often been photographed wearing fur over the years.
PETA, the animal rights group, also commended the queen for the move.
“The Queen’s decision is in line with the many forward-thinking consumers, businesses and nations that are recognizing that innovative faux-fur fabrics are better for the environment and spare animals a miserable life and a bloody, painful death,” the group said.
PETA, however, renewed its call for the queen’s guard to discontinue its use of bearskin hats and replace them with fake fur.