Federal judges block Donald Trump’s order to exclude illegals from census results used to allocate Congress districts – setting case up for another Supreme Court clash
- Three federal judges in New York blocked order from Trump to exclude people in the country illegally from the process of redrawing congressional districts
- Appeals judges ruled the presidential order issued in late July was unlawful and the harm it would cause would last a decade
- Only Supreme Court can review their decision – setting up possibility of another blockbuster case over the census
- Ruled presidential order violated laws governing the execution of the once-a-decade census
- Also violated and also the process for redrawing congressional districts known as apportionment
Published: | Updated:
A panel of three federal judges on Thursday blocked an order from President Donald Trump that tried to exclude people in the country illegally from the process of redrawing congressional districts.
The federal judges in New York, in granting an injunction, said the presidential order issued in late July was unlawful and the harm it would cause would last a decade.
The judges prohibited Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross, whose agency oversees the U.S. Census Bureau, from excluding people in the country illegally when handing in 2020 census figures used to calculate how many congressional seats each state gets.
According to the judges, the presidential order violated laws governing the execution of the once-a-decade census and also the process for redrawing congressional districts known as apportionment by requiring that two sets of numbers be presented – one with the total count and the other dealing with people living in the country illegally.
Crucial count: The results of the 2020 census are used to draw up numbers of Congressional districts for the next decade, a process known as apportionment
The judges said that those in the country illegally qualify as people to be counted in the states they reside. They declined to say whether the order violated the Constitution.
‘Throughout the Nation’s history, the figures used to determine the apportionment of Congress – in the language of the current statutes, the “total population” and the “whole number of persons” in each State – have included every person residing in the United States at the time of the census, whether citizen or non-citizen and whether living here with legal status or without,’ the judges wrote.
The lawsuits challenging the presidential order were brought by a coalition of states led by New York and several civil rights groups.
Because the lawsuits dealt with questions about apportionment, it was heard by a three-judge panel that allows the decision to be appealed directly to the U.S. Supreme Court.
‘This is a huge victory for voting rights and for immigrants’ rights,’ said Dale Ho, director of the ACLU’s Voting Rights Project, one of the group’s that challenged the order.
‘President Trump has tried and failed yet again to weaponize the census against immigrant communities. The law is clear – every person counts in the census.’